fatawakening wrote:AskDrFeeder wrote:
I know it's just for fun but I feel compelled to point ask anyway:
Why is the feedee is the only one with responsibilities??
A record company sent me a contract once that had 15 ways they could screw me and only one clause where they accepted a few very limited responsibilities on their part.
This is even worse!
Where would you improve it and how would you go about a contract for a feeder?
Got me there. I've tried to write contracts like this in the past and always get bogged down.
I think if it's a short-term relationship--on the order of a month or less--a contract is not required. Common civility is sufficient.
If it's a long-term relationship it should be based on love, not feeding. Feeding and gaining should not be requirements, just side-benefits. If you want a contract, the standard marriage contract should do!
